Add weimarnetz endoresement
[web.git] / development.txt
1 ---
2 ---
3 Development
4 ===========
5
6 == The Source Code
7
8 The LEDE project source code starts off with OpenWrt revision r49258. The code
9 is stored inside a git tree which contains all branches and releases ever made
10 by OpenWrt. While importing the sources the tree was normalised and some
11 minor tweaks were made to committer names and mail addresses.
12
13 All repositories can be browsed online through
14 http://git.lede-project.org/[Gitweb] as well.
15
16 === Getting The _LEDE_ Code
17
18 Any _LEDE_ development happens in the main +source.git+ repository which is
19 accessible via both HTTP and HTTPS:
20
21 ----
22 git clone http://git.lede-project.org/source.git
23 ----
24
25 You can find a mirror of the repository on Github:
26
27 ----
28 git clone https://github.com/lede-project/source.git
29 ----
30
31 === Getting the OpenWrt Code
32
33 We keep the original OpenWrt source code up to
34 https://git.lede-project.org/?p=openwrt/source.git;a=commit;h=ee53a240ac902dc83209008a2671e7fdcf55957a[r49258]
35 available, mostly as reference and for historic interest.
36
37 The original OpenWrt Subversion repository has been split up into several Git
38 repositories mapping the various SVN directories and tags to proper Git
39 branches.
40
41 ----
42 git clone http://git.lede-project.org/openwrt/source.git
43 git clone http://git.lede-project.org/openwrt/packages.git
44 git clone http://git.lede-project.org/openwrt/feeds.git
45 git clone http://git.lede-project.org/openwrt/docs.git
46 ----
47
48 === The Web Presence
49
50 The pages you're reading are generated from text files using the
51 http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/[AsciiDoc] suite. Any changes made to the
52 projects web site will be reflected in our +web.git+ repository:
53
54 ----
55 git clone http://git.lede-project.org/web.git
56 ----
57
58 === Submitting Patches
59
60 The biggest difference is that we now accept pull requests. The tree that shall
61 be pulled from needs to be hosted publicly. Small fixes and minor patches can
62 also be submitted via the
63 http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev[development mailing list].
64 Submissions should follow these rules
65
66 . TBD
67
68 All patches need to be sent in a format that they are listed in http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/lede/list/[patchwork].
69 If the patch does not get listed in patchwork then it won't get processed.
70
71
72 === Reporting Bugs
73
74 . *All* bug reports need to be submitted via the
75 http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev[development mailing list]
76 . When reporting bugs please make sure to
77 .. Name the tree/revision
78 .. Name the affected device
79 .. What does it do that it should not do / what does it not do that it should do
80 .. Steps to reproduce
81 .. What you have already done to fix the problem
82 .. Any additional info you thinks is important
83 . Reporting a bug means that you reported a bug. It does not constitute a claim that
84 anyone has to work on fixing it.
85 . Pointless/vague/silly/... bugs reports will be ignored
86 . Feature requests are not Bugs. They will also be ignored.
87 . The better your bug report, the more likely it is that it will be worked on.
88
89 All bug reports need to be sent in a format so that they are listed in the issue
90 tracker (__LINK__). If the bug report does not get listed in the issue tracker then
91 it won't get processed.
92
93
94 === Patch Merging And Tree Life Cycle
95
96 We encourage committers to host their own staging trees where they aggregate patches
97 that they feel responsible for and/or ones that they created themselves. Once the tree
98 has been reviewed and tested it can be proposed for inclusion in the master branch.
99
100 . Trees will be merged into master at any time
101 . Bug fixes can be merged into master directly
102 . PRs can be sent to the patches mailing list from any source and will always be considered
103 for inclusion if the quality of the tree is good and format of submission is correct
104 . Staging trees can be hosted as part of the projects git infrastucture, private servers, ...
105
106 === Kernel updates
107
108 It has proven impractical and a time killer to always be on the very latest kernel within
109 2 days of its release. It has caused these issues.
110
111 . diversification of kernel versions
112 . pressure on maintainers to constantly upgrade rather than stabilise
113 . huge effort invested to upgrade 3-4 times between releases
114 . huge workload to maintain kmod-* packaging
115 . Upgrade to kernels that might not be fully tested
116
117 This is obviously not an invite to sit on ancient and dusty kernels. A sane path in between
118 should be taken that give the community recent kernels without causing unnecessary workload
119 and stability issues.
120
121 There should be a max of three concurrent kernel version. Having only two concurrent versions
122 is better than three.
123
124 In Short - stability should be valued higher than bleeding edge, although bleeding edge is
125 also important, but not as a trade-off to stability.
126
127
128 === Releases
129
130 Generating Releases has already been vastly automated. The remaining parts of the process need
131 to also be automated before the first _LEDE_ release. We will introduce a TESTERS file that is
132 formatted similarly to the MAINTAINERS file of the kernel. Community members can list themselves
133 as testers for a target/profile/device. Once a release has been generated testers should receive
134 an email informing them of the requirement for images to be tested. It needs to be decided if only
135 tested images should be included in the binary release.
136
137 Releases should
138
139 . Happen at least once a year
140 . Have at least one maintenance update
141 . Provide CVE/critical/... fixes for at least one year after the release
142 . Only include maintained targets
143 . Only include targets that have seen on device testing
144 . Be ready when they are ready
145
146 See the TODO page for more info.