Grammar fix Signed-off-by: Stan Grishin <stangri@melmac.net>
[web.git] / development.txt
1 ---
2 ---
3 Development
4 ===========
5
6 == The Source Code
7
8 The LEDE project source code starts off with OpenWrt revision r49258. The code
9 is stored inside a git tree which contains all branches and releases ever made
10 by OpenWrt. While importing the sources the tree was normalised and some
11 minor tweaks were made to committer names and mail addresses.
12
13 All repositories can be browsed online through
14 https://git.lede-project.org/[Gitweb] as well.
15
16 === Getting The _LEDE_ Code
17
18 Any _LEDE_ development happens in the main +source.git+ repository which is
19 accessible via both HTTP and HTTPS:
20
21 ----
22 git clone https://git.lede-project.org/source.git
23 ----
24
25 You can find a mirror of the repository on Github:
26
27 ----
28 git clone https://github.com/lede-project/source.git
29 ----
30
31 === Getting the OpenWrt Code
32
33 We keep the original OpenWrt source code up to
34 https://git.lede-project.org/?p=openwrt/source.git;a=commit;h=ee53a240ac902dc83209008a2671e7fdcf55957a[r49258]
35 available, mostly as reference and for historic interest.
36
37 The original OpenWrt Subversion repository has been split up into several Git
38 repositories mapping the various SVN directories and tags to proper Git
39 branches.
40
41 ----
42 git clone https://git.lede-project.org/openwrt/source.git
43 git clone https://git.lede-project.org/openwrt/packages.git
44 git clone https://git.lede-project.org/openwrt/feeds.git
45 git clone https://git.lede-project.org/openwrt/docs.git
46 ----
47
48 === The Web Presence
49
50 The pages you're reading are generated from text files using the
51 http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/[AsciiDoc] suite. Any changes made to the
52 projects web site will be reflected in our +web.git+ repository:
53
54 ----
55 git clone https://git.lede-project.org/web.git
56 ----
57
58 === Submitting Patches
59
60 The biggest difference is that we now accept pull requests. The tree that shall
61 be pulled from needs to be hosted publicly. Small fixes and minor patches can
62 also be submitted via the
63 https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev[development mailing list].
64 Submissions should follow these rules
65
66 . TBD
67
68 All patches need to be sent in a format that they are listed in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/lede/list/[patchwork].
69 If the patch does not get listed in patchwork then it won't get processed.
70
71
72 === Staging Trees
73
74 To create yourself a staging tree on git.lede-project.org:
75 ----
76 ssh git@git.lede-project.org "create lede/yournick/staging"
77 ssh git@git.lede-project.org "desc lede/yournick/staging Staging tree of Your Name"
78 ----
79
80
81 === Reporting Bugs
82
83 . Please report your bugs using our https://bugs.lede-project.org/[issue tracker]
84 . When reporting bugs please make sure to
85 .. Name the tree/revision
86 .. Name the affected device
87 .. What does it do that it should not do / what does it not do that it should do
88 .. Steps to reproduce
89 .. What you have already done to fix the problem
90 .. Any additional info you thinks is important
91 . Reporting a bug means that you reported a bug. It does not constitute a claim that
92 anyone has to work on fixing it.
93 . Pointless/vague/silly/... bugs reports will be ignored
94 . The better your bug report, the more likely it is that it will be worked on.
95
96
97 === Patch Merging And Tree Life Cycle
98
99 We encourage committers to host their own staging trees where they aggregate patches
100 that they feel responsible for and/or ones that they created themselves. Once the tree
101 has been reviewed and tested it can be proposed for inclusion in the master branch.
102
103 . Trees will be merged into master at any time
104 . Bug fixes can be merged into master directly
105 . PRs can be sent to the patches mailing list from any source and will always be considered
106 for inclusion if the quality of the tree is good and format of submission is correct
107 . Staging trees can be hosted as part of the projects git infrastucture, private servers, ...
108
109 === Kernel updates
110
111 It has proven impractical and a time killer to always be on the very latest kernel within
112 2 days of its release. It has caused these issues.
113
114 . diversification of kernel versions
115 . pressure on maintainers to constantly upgrade rather than stabilise
116 . huge effort invested to upgrade 3-4 times between releases
117 . huge workload to maintain kmod-* packaging
118 . Upgrade to kernels that might not be fully tested
119
120 This is obviously not an invite to sit on ancient and dusty kernels. A sane path in between
121 should be taken that give the community recent kernels without causing unnecessary workload
122 and stability issues.
123
124 There should be a max of three concurrent kernel version. Having only two concurrent versions
125 is better than three.
126
127 In Short - stability should be valued higher than bleeding edge, although bleeding edge is
128 also important, but not as a trade-off to stability.
129
130
131 === Releases
132
133 Generating Releases has already been vastly automated. The remaining parts of the process need
134 to also be automated before the first _LEDE_ release. We will introduce a TESTERS file that is
135 formatted similarly to the MAINTAINERS file of the kernel. Community members can list themselves
136 as testers for a target/profile/device. Once a release has been generated testers should receive
137 an email informing them of the requirement for images to be tested. It needs to be decided if only
138 tested images should be included in the binary release.
139
140 Releases should
141
142 . Happen at least once a year
143 . Have at least one maintenance update
144 . Provide CVE/critical/... fixes for at least one year after the release
145 . Only include maintained targets
146 . Only include targets that have seen on device testing
147 . Be ready when they are ready
148
149 See the TODO page for more info.