gemfile: add json requirement.

[web.git] / faq.txt

diff --git a/faq.txt b/faq.txt
index 27220c3758250e187aa3201b5e916891cc87a686..24328563b0e84bd5b6e7aa27cf0f1e7d35d24441 100644 (file)
--- a/faq.txt
+++ b/faq.txt
@@ -43,22 +43,22 @@ There are no plans to change the license of the LEDE code. It should be easy to
 
 == Were there any technical reasons to split from OpenWrt?
 
-Nothing special, expect that LEDE wants to focus more on stability and not so much on bleeding edge any any more.
+Nothing special, expect that LEDE wants to focus more on stability and not so much on bleeding edge any more.
 The release process should be better automatized and the release should be better tested.
 
 == What license does LEDE use?
 
 The build system and many LEDE components are licensed under the GNU General Public License Version 2. Some parts are licensed under different licenses, this is mostly the case for packages not created in LEDE or OpenWrt.
 
-== Who hold the copyright of LEDE code?
+== Who holds the copyright of LEDE code?
 
-The original authors of the code holds the copyright.
+The original authors of the code hold the copyright.
 
 == Is the LEDE project a registered legal entity?
 
-No, the LEDE project is not a registered legal entity. The OpenWrt project is also no registered legal entity, but OpenWrt is represented by the Software in the Public Interest (SPI).
+No, the LEDE project is not a registered legal entity. The OpenWrt project is also not a registered legal entity, but OpenWrt is represented by 'Software in the Public Interest' (SPI).
 
 == Is LEDE a registered trademark?
 
-No, LEDE is not a registered trademark, but OpenWrt is a registered trademark which is holden by the Software in the Public Interest (SPI) in the name of the OpenWrt project.
+No, LEDE is not a registered trademark, but OpenWrt is a registered trademark which is held by the Software in the Public Interest (SPI) in the name of the OpenWrt project.