From 39e5cd95565ee981553fe7e51328703be5016a53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Schiller Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:56:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ltq-vdsl: fix PM thread suspend and resume handling This is a backport form drv_dsl_cpe_api-4.18.10 and fixes some PM thread handling issues which lead to high system load and watchdog trigger within 1h of uptime for boards not connected to a xdsl line. Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller --- package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/Makefile | 2 +- .../ltq-vdsl/patches/110-semaphore-lock.patch | 107 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/patches/110-semaphore-lock.patch diff --git a/package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/Makefile b/package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/Makefile index c9667c9945..3770d1067d 100644 --- a/package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/Makefile +++ b/package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/Makefile @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ include $(INCLUDE_DIR)/kernel.mk PKG_NAME:=ltq-vdsl-vr9 PKG_VERSION:=4.17.18.6 -PKG_RELEASE:=1 +PKG_RELEASE:=2 PKG_BASE_NAME:=drv_dsl_cpe_api PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_BASE_NAME)_vrx-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.gz diff --git a/package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/patches/110-semaphore-lock.patch b/package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/patches/110-semaphore-lock.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..12c00c33ec --- /dev/null +++ b/package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/patches/110-semaphore-lock.patch @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ +--- a/src/include/drv_dsl_cpe_pm_core.h ++++ b/src/include/drv_dsl_cpe_pm_core.h +@@ -1510,9 +1510,9 @@ typedef struct + /** Common PM module mutex*/ + DSL_DRV_Mutex_t pmMutex; + /** PM module direction Near-End mutex*/ +- DSL_DRV_Mutex_t pmNeMutex; ++ struct semaphore pmNeMutex; + /** PM module direction Far-End mutex*/ +- DSL_DRV_Mutex_t pmFeMutex; ++ struct semaphore pmFeMutex; + /** PM module Near-End access mutex*/ + DSL_DRV_Mutex_t pmNeAccessMutex; + /** PM module Far-End access mutex*/ +--- a/src/pm/drv_dsl_cpe_api_pm.c ++++ b/src/pm/drv_dsl_cpe_api_pm.c +@@ -220,9 +220,9 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_Start( + /* init PM module common mutex */ + DSL_DRV_MUTEX_INIT(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmMutex); + /* init PM module direction Near-End mutex */ +- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_INIT(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex); ++ sema_init(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex),1); + /* init PM module direction Far-End mutex */ +- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_INIT(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex); ++ sema_init(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex),1); + /* init PM module Near-End access mutex */ + DSL_DRV_MUTEX_INIT(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeAccessMutex); + /* init PM module Far-End access mutex */ +@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_Stop( + if( DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmThreadFe.bRun != DSL_TRUE ) + { + DSL_DEBUG(DSL_DBG_WRN, +- (pContext, SYS_DBG_WRN"DSL[%02d]: PM module Near-End thread already stopped" ++ (pContext, SYS_DBG_WRN"DSL[%02d]: PM module Far-End thread already stopped" + DSL_DRV_CRLF, DSL_DEV_NUM(pContext))); + } + else +--- a/src/pm/drv_dsl_cpe_pm_core.c ++++ b/src/pm/drv_dsl_cpe_pm_core.c +@@ -1022,7 +1022,7 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_DirectionMutexCon + { + if( bLock ) + { +- if( DSL_DRV_MUTEX_LOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex) ) ++ if(down_interruptible(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex))) + { + DSL_DEBUG( DSL_DBG_ERR, + (pContext, SYS_DBG_ERR"DSL[%02d]: ERROR - Couldn't lock PM NE mutex!" +@@ -1034,14 +1034,14 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_DirectionMutexCon + else + { + /* Unlock PM module NE Mutex*/ +- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_UNLOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex); ++ up(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex)); + } + } + else + { + if( bLock ) + { +- if( DSL_DRV_MUTEX_LOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex) ) ++ if(down_interruptible(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex))) + { + DSL_DEBUG( DSL_DBG_ERR, + (pContext, SYS_DBG_ERR"DSL[%02d]: ERROR - Couldn't lock PM FE mutex!" +@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_DirectionMutexCon + else + { + /* Unlock PM module FE Mutex*/ +- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_UNLOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex); ++ up(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex)); + } + } + +@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_Lock(DSL_Context_ + if( !(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->bPmLock) ) + { + /* Lock PM module Near-End Mutex*/ +- if( DSL_DRV_MUTEX_LOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex) ) ++ if(down_interruptible(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex))) + { + DSL_DEBUG( DSL_DBG_ERR, + (pContext, SYS_DBG_ERR"DSL[%02d]: ERROR - Couldn't lock PM NE mutex!" +@@ -1148,8 +1148,8 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_Lock(DSL_Context_ + return DSL_ERR_SEMAPHORE_GET; + } + +- /* Lock PM module Near-End Mutex*/ +- if( DSL_DRV_MUTEX_LOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex) ) ++ /* Lock PM module Far-End Mutex*/ ++ if( down_interruptible(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex)) ) + { + DSL_DEBUG( DSL_DBG_ERR, + (pContext, SYS_DBG_ERR"DSL[%02d]: ERROR - Couldn't lock PM FE mutex!" +@@ -1193,10 +1193,10 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_UnLock(DSL_Contex + if( DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->bPmLock ) + { + /* Unlock PM module NE Mutex*/ +- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_UNLOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex); ++ up(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex)); + + /* Unlock PM module FE Mutex*/ +- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_UNLOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex); ++ up(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex)); + + /* Clear bPmLock flag*/ + DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->bPmLock = DSL_FALSE; -- 2.30.2