From 81128b9598cc6fbddf60c5bdf1176ec4b0244b3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Fainelli Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:32:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] binutils/2.22: backport an upstream fix for an assertion in the ARM backend. See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13990 for more details. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli SVN-Revision: 34260 --- .../patches/2.22/500-arm_ld_assert_fix.patch | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) create mode 100644 toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/500-arm_ld_assert_fix.patch diff --git a/toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/500-arm_ld_assert_fix.patch b/toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/500-arm_ld_assert_fix.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..25e26db239 --- /dev/null +++ b/toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/500-arm_ld_assert_fix.patch @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13990 for details. +--- +diff -u -r1.287 -r1.288 +--- a/bfd/elf32-arm.c 2012/04/24 05:12:31 1.287 ++++ b/bfd/elf32-arm.c 2012/04/24 16:09:12 1.288 +@@ -12256,8 +12256,19 @@ + if (may_need_local_target_p + && elf32_arm_get_plt_info (abfd, eh, r_symndx, &root_plt, &arm_plt)) + { +- BFD_ASSERT (root_plt->refcount > 0); +- root_plt->refcount -= 1; ++ /* If PLT refcount book-keeping is wrong and too low, we'll ++ see a zero value (going to -1) for the root PLT reference ++ count. */ ++ if (root_plt->refcount >= 0) ++ { ++ BFD_ASSERT (root_plt->refcount != 0); ++ root_plt->refcount -= 1; ++ } ++ else ++ /* A value of -1 means the symbol has become local, forced ++ or seeing a hidden definition. Any other negative value ++ is an error. */ ++ BFD_ASSERT (root_plt->refcount == -1); + + if (!call_reloc_p) + arm_plt->noncall_refcount--; + -- 2.30.2