target/linux/generic/backport-5.15/020-v6.3-23-mm-multi-gen-LRU-remove-eviction-fairness-safeguard.patch

   1 From ce45f1c4b32cf69b166f56ef5bc6c761e06ed4e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
   2 From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
   3 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 21:19:01 -0700
   4 Subject: [PATCH 23/29] mm: multi-gen LRU: remove eviction fairness safeguard
   5
   6 Recall that the eviction consumes the oldest generation: first it
   7 bucket-sorts pages whose gen counters were updated by the aging and
   8 reclaims the rest; then it increments lrugen->min_seq.
   9
  10 The current eviction fairness safeguard for global reclaim has a
  11 dilemma: when there are multiple eligible memcgs, should it continue
  12 or stop upon meeting the reclaim goal? If it continues, it overshoots
  13 and increases direct reclaim latency; if it stops, it loses fairness
  14 between memcgs it has taken memory away from and those it has yet to.
  15
  16 With memcg LRU, the eviction, while ensuring eventual fairness, will
  17 stop upon meeting its goal. Therefore the current eviction fairness
  18 safeguard for global reclaim will not be needed.
  19
  20 Note that memcg LRU only applies to global reclaim. For memcg reclaim,
  21 the eviction will continue, even if it is overshooting. This becomes
  22 unconditional due to code simplification.
  23
  24 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-4-yuzhao@google.com
  25 Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
  26 Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
  27 Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
  28 Cc: Michael Larabel <Michael@MichaelLarabel.com>
  29 Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
  30 Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
  31 Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
  32 Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
  33 Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
  34 ---
  35  mm/vmscan.c | 82 +++++++++++++++--------------------------------------
  36  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
  37
  38 --- a/mm/vmscan.c
  39 +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
  40 @@ -443,6 +443,11 @@ static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_c
  41         return sc->target_mem_cgroup;
  42  }
  43
  44 +static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
  45 +{
  46 +       return !sc->target_mem_cgroup || mem_cgroup_is_root(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
  47 +}
  48 +
  49  /**
  50   * writeback_throttling_sane - is the usual dirty throttling mechanism available?
  51   * @sc: scan_control in question
  52 @@ -493,6 +498,11 @@ static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_c
  53         return false;
  54  }
  55
  56 +static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
  57 +{
  58 +       return true;
  59 +}
  60 +
  61  static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc)
  62  {
  63         return true;
  64 @@ -4722,8 +4732,7 @@ static int isolate_pages(struct lruvec *
  65         return scanned;
  66  }
  67
  68 -static int evict_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness,
  69 -                      bool *need_swapping)
  70 +static int evict_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness)
  71  {
  72         int type;
  73         int scanned;
  74 @@ -4812,9 +4821,6 @@ retry:
  75                 goto retry;
  76         }
  77
  78 -       if (need_swapping && type == LRU_GEN_ANON)
  79 -               *need_swapping = true;
  80 -
  81         return scanned;
  82  }
  83
  84 @@ -4853,68 +4859,26 @@ done:
  85         return min_seq[!can_swap] + MIN_NR_GENS <= max_seq ? nr_to_scan : 0;
  86  }
  87
  88 -static bool should_abort_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long seq,
  89 -                             struct scan_control *sc, bool need_swapping)
  90 +static unsigned long get_nr_to_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
  91  {
  92 -       int i;
  93 -       DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec);
  94 -
  95 -       if (!current_is_kswapd()) {
  96 -               /* age each memcg once to ensure fairness */
  97 -               if (max_seq - seq > 1)
  98 -                       return true;
  99 -
 100 -               /* over-swapping can increase allocation latency */
 101 -               if (sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim && need_swapping)
 102 -                       return true;
 103 -
 104 -               /* give this thread a chance to exit and free its memory */
 105 -               if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
 106 -                       sc->nr_reclaimed += MIN_LRU_BATCH;
 107 -                       return true;
 108 -               }
 109 -
 110 -               if (cgroup_reclaim(sc))
 111 -                       return false;
 112 -       } else if (sc->nr_reclaimed - sc->last_reclaimed < sc->nr_to_reclaim)
 113 -               return false;
 114 -
 115 -       /* keep scanning at low priorities to ensure fairness */
 116 -       if (sc->priority > DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
 117 -               return false;
 118 -
 119 -       /*
 120 -        * A minimum amount of work was done under global memory pressure. For
 121 -        * kswapd, it may be overshooting. For direct reclaim, the target isn't
 122 -        * met, and yet the allocation may still succeed, since kswapd may have
 123 -        * caught up. In either case, it's better to stop now, and restart if
 124 -        * necessary.
 125 -        */
 126 -       for (i = 0; i <= sc->reclaim_idx; i++) {
 127 -               unsigned long wmark;
 128 -               struct zone *zone = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->node_zones + i;
 129 -
 130 -               if (!managed_zone(zone))
 131 -                       continue;
 132 -
 133 -               wmark = current_is_kswapd() ? high_wmark_pages(zone) : low_wmark_pages(zone);
 134 -               if (wmark > zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES))
 135 -                       return false;
 136 -       }
 137 +       /* don't abort memcg reclaim to ensure fairness */
 138 +       if (!global_reclaim(sc))
 139 +               return -1;
 140
 141 -       sc->nr_reclaimed += MIN_LRU_BATCH;
 142 +       /* discount the previous progress for kswapd */
 143 +       if (current_is_kswapd())
 144 +               return sc->nr_to_reclaim + sc->last_reclaimed;
 145
 146 -       return true;
 147 +       return max(sc->nr_to_reclaim, compact_gap(sc->order));
 148  }
 149
 150  static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 151  {
 152         struct blk_plug plug;
 153         bool need_aging = false;
 154 -       bool need_swapping = false;
 155         unsigned long scanned = 0;
 156         unsigned long reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
 157 -       DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec);
 158 +       unsigned long nr_to_reclaim = get_nr_to_reclaim(sc);
 159
 160         lru_add_drain();
 161
 162 @@ -4938,7 +4902,7 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct
 163                 if (!nr_to_scan)
 164                         goto done;
 165
 166 -               delta = evict_pages(lruvec, sc, swappiness, &need_swapping);
 167 +               delta = evict_pages(lruvec, sc, swappiness);
 168                 if (!delta)
 169                         goto done;
 170
 171 @@ -4946,7 +4910,7 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct
 172                 if (scanned >= nr_to_scan)
 173                         break;
 174
 175 -               if (should_abort_scan(lruvec, max_seq, sc, need_swapping))
 176 +               if (sc->nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim)
 177                         break;
 178
 179                 cond_resched();
 180 @@ -5393,7 +5357,7 @@ static int run_eviction(struct lruvec *l
 181                 if (sc->nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim)
 182                         return 0;
 183
 184 -               if (!evict_pages(lruvec, sc, swappiness, NULL))
 185 +               if (!evict_pages(lruvec, sc, swappiness))
 186                         return 0;
 187
 188                 cond_resched();